[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301361379.26693.742.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:16:19 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc: drosenberg@...curity.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
security@...nel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ROSE: prevent heap corruption with bad facilities
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:48:05 +0000
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] rose: Add length checks to CALL_REQUEST parsing
> >
> > Define some constant offsets for CALL_REQUEST based on the description
> > at <http://www.techfest.com/networking/wan/x25plp.htm> and the
> > definition of ROSE as using 10-digit (5-byte) addresses. Use them
> > consistently. Validate all implicit and explicit facilities lengths.
> > Validate the address length byte rather than either trusting or
> > assuming its value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>
> Applied.
Ralf, I would really appreciate it if you could test this soon...
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists