[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110331094041.GD3371@pulham.picochip.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:40:41 +0100
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] macb: add support for Cadence GEM
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:55 Tue 22 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > Hi Jean-Christophe,
> > > Also, can you confirm that the module ID's that you are using to
> > > differentiate between AT91 and AVR32 won't clash with MACB uses in
> > > other, non-at91/avr32 chips, or that it doesn't matter?
> >
> > If this does work, then it would be nice if we made the else path of the
> > RMII AT91 tests also test for avr32 too so we aren't driving the USRIO
> > pins on platforms that aren't at91 but also aren't avr32. So something
> > the patch below instead.
> I'm currently traveling so I can not test it yet will test it next week
> but looks good
Just wondering if you'd had chance to test. If so, would you mind
reposting and I'll rebase my patches on top of it.
I also have patches for checksum offloading, receive packet timestamping
and wake-on-lan support but I'd like to get the basic GEM ones into next
first.
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists