| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1301582872.3169.44.camel@edumazet-laptop> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:47:52 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: "\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@...dex.ru> Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: Kernel panic nf_nat_setup_info+0x5b3/0x6e0 Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 18:03 +0400, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" a écrit : > > 26.03.2011, 16:44, "Changli Gao" <xiaosuo@...il.com>: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>; wrote: > > > >> Please try the patch attached and test if the problem is solved or not. Thanks. > > > > Any feedback? Thanks. > > > > Seems that patch is fine. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21512 > I wonder if this is not hiding another bug. Adding an RCU grace period might reduce the probability window. By the time nf_conntrack_free(ct) is called, no other cpu/thread could/should use ct, or ct->ext ? Sure, another thread can find/pass_on ct in a lookup but should not use it, since its refcount (ct_general.use) should be 0. Patrick ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists