lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301582872.3169.44.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:47:52 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@...dex.ru>
Cc:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic nf_nat_setup_info+0x5b3/0x6e0

Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 18:03 +0400, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" a écrit :
> 
> 26.03.2011, 16:44, "Changli Gao" <xiaosuo@...il.com>:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>; wrote:
> >
> >>  Please try the patch attached and test if the problem is solved or not. Thanks.
> >
> > Any feedback? Thanks.
> >
> 
> Seems that patch is fine.
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21512
> 

I wonder if this is not hiding another bug.

Adding an RCU grace period might reduce the probability window.

By the time nf_conntrack_free(ct) is called, no other cpu/thread
could/should use ct, or ct->ext ?

Sure, another thread can find/pass_on ct in a lookup but should not use
it, since its refcount (ct_general.use) should be 0.

Patrick ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ