netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/9 net-next-2.6] qlcnic: Code cleanup and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E6A59B41-286C-4C7D-881D-652963BAFA9D@qlogic.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:03:49 -0700
From:	Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
To:	Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dept_NX_Linux_NIC_Driver <Dept_NX_Linux_NIC_Driver@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 net-next-2.6] qlcnic: Code cleanup and fixes

On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:

> Please apply.
>
> thanks,
> Anirban
>

It turned out that patch no. 8 has a conflict with the following patch:

commit 673e63c688f43104c73aad8ea4237f7ad41fa14d
net: fix ethtool->set_flags not intended -EINVAL return value

Please do not apply the current series as I'm resending it.

thanks,
Anirban

This message and any attached documents contain information from QLogic Corporation or its wholly-owned subsidiaries that may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html