[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim68LoiyFA4+3weHkmuVpc=xxmHnheiEf_OH0LK@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:55:04 -0700
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vlan: convert VLAN devices to use hw_features
2011/3/31 Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>:
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> index e34ea9e..b84a46b 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> @@ -704,8 +704,8 @@ static int vlan_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
> (1<<__LINK_STATE_DORMANT))) |
> (1<<__LINK_STATE_PRESENT);
>
> - dev->features |= real_dev->features & real_dev->vlan_features;
> - dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
> + dev->hw_features = real_dev->vlan_features & NETIF_F_ALL_TX_OFFLOADS;
> + dev->features |= real_dev->vlan_features | NETIF_F_LLTX;
Shouldn't this continue to use real_dev->feaures &
real_dev->vlan_features? In some places capabilities are blindly
added to vlan_features on the assumption that they will later be ANDed
with the real capabilities of the hardware (for example, see
register_netdevice()).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists