[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110405180337.GA16977@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:03:37 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NETIF_F_TSO vs NETIF_F_TSO{6,_ECN}
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> According to the commit that introduced NETIF_F_TSO6
> (f83ef8c0b58dac17211a4c0b6df0e2b1bd6637b1):
>
> This patch will introduce a new flag NETIF_F_TSO6 which will be used
> to check whether device supports TSO over IPv6. If device support TSO
> over IPv6 then we don't clear of NETIF_F_TSO and which will make the
> TCP layer to create TSO packets. Any device supporting TSO over IPv6
> will set NETIF_F_TSO6 flag in "dev->features" along with NETIF_F_TSO.
>
> In case when user disables TSO using ethtool, NETIF_F_TSO will get
> cleared from "dev->features". So even if we have NETIF_F_TSO6 we don't
> get TSO packets created by TCP layer.
>
> So I think we need to either:
> 1. Disallow toggling NETIF_F_TSO6 (following the previous rule)
> 2. Disable NETIF_F_TSO6 when NETIF_F_TSO is disabled
>
> The same presumably applies to NETIF_F_TSO_ECN.
There seems to be no such dependency in the networking code. I.e. TSO6
should just work with TSO4 disabled.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists