[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110406.130630.229741188.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucian.grijincu@...il.com
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, tavi@...pub.ro,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] sysctl: net: call unregister_net_sysctl_table
where needed
From: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:04:53 +0200
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:52 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> Oops, hmmm... Can this actually cause any real problems currently?
>>
>> If so I'd like to toss this specific patch into net-2.6
>
>
> Nope:
>
> void unregister_net_sysctl_table(struct ctl_table_header *header)
> {
> unregister_sysctl_table(header);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_net_sysctl_table);
Ok, that's good.
> But I thought that in the future, if something special needs to be
> done for unregister_net_sysctl_table, it would be better to have these
> consistent. I'll do a check on all the tree to see if there are other
> cases.
>
> Another approach would be to remove unregister_net_sysctl_table, as it
> does nothing different of unregister_sysctl_table and let our future
> selves deal with the problem.
>
> Can you tell me what you'd like?
I think the thing to do is to keep this patch as it is, and only apply
it along with this cookie patch series, for -next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists