[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1104061400320.6556@JBRANDEB-DESK2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:08:01 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"jesse.brandeburg@...il.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
"fedora-kernel-list@...hat.com" <fedora-kernel-list@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fedora 14 kernel performance with ip forwarding workload
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:29 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:18:56 +0200
> >
> > > I remember last time I work on a fedora kernel, it had conntrack enabled
> > >
> > > And yes, conntrack can really slowdown a router, because of default
> > > parameters.
> >
> > Yes, if conntrack is enabled performance will indeed tank.
>
> I just check on latest fedora14 (yum updated) :
>
> - conntrack is statically included in kernel, you cannot remove it.
>
>
> Hmm...
Thanks for the replies,
Yes indeed, I bet that conntrack was the item that caused the grief I saw.
In fact turning off CONFIG_NETFILTER disables conntrack and solved my
problem. :-)
Now the question is how to get the netfiltery/conntracky goodness without
impacting those who want to go fast, maybe without a helmet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists