[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110406160713.7ff48ef1@nehalam>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:07:13 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket
any more
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:42:39 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32832
Summary: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.38
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: IPV4
AssignedTo: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
ReportedBy: kees@...flux.net
Regression: Yes
In 2.6.35 and earlier, shutdown(2) will fully remove a socket. This does not
appear to be true any more and is causing software to misbehave.
2.6.35:
$ ./testcase
parent: 5957
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 5961
$ ./testcase
parent: 6001
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 6002
2.6.38:
$ ./testcase
parent: 1138
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 1142
$ ./testcase
bind: Address already in use
The listener doesn't show up in netstat any more, but as long as the child
process is running, the socket is unavailable. It is as if the shutdown(2)
behavior has partially reverted to close(2) behavior (but in the case of using
close(2), the child's socket would remain visible in netstat).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists