netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix panic in ip6_pol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFCD49CDC4.C2B9408D-ON6525786A.002C2B92-6525786A.002CBDC6@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:40:57 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix panic in ip6_pol_route

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 04/06/2011 01:10:43 PM:

> > The fix is to not update ip6_null_entry for a vlan device. Please
> > review.
>
> This is just rediculious.
>
> Configuring a vlan on loopback is stupid.
>
> Having IFF_LOOPBACK be set on a loopback device is even more
> stupid.
>
> So fix one of those two things, otherwise we'll just add a million
> tests over time to this conditional.

We had asked the test team for the reason for this test case:

"I suspect that the use of the loopback, is simply due to some of
our images being very limited and the automated test needed an
interface that it could assume would always exist"

Is it better to disallow configuring vlan on lo?

thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html