netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: convert protocol handling to RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110406092727.GC342@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:27:27 +0200
From:	Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: convert protocol handling to RCU

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:01:16PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> This patch removes spin_locks at CAN socket creation time by using RCU.
Good thing.

I'm interested in RCU also for my J1939 code.
I do have some questions below. These are mainly since I'm not yet used
to RCU. Btw, I must have missed v1 of the patch, so I may ask 'already
resolved' things...
> 
>  
> +static struct can_proto *can_try_module_get(int protocol)
> +{
> +	struct can_proto *cp;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cp = rcu_dereference(proto_tab[protocol]);
> +	if (cp && !try_module_get(cp->prot->owner))
After the xxx_get, is the 'cp' pointer persistent?
> +		cp = NULL;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return cp;
> +}
> +
>  static int can_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
>  		      int kern)
>  {
> @@ -130,9 +143,12 @@ static int can_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
>  	if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
>  		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
>  
> +	cp = can_try_module_get(protocol);
> +
>  
[...]
>  	/* check for available protocol and correct usage */
>  
>  	if (!cp)
>  		return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
>  
>  	if (cp->type != sock->type) {
I don't see how this will evaluate to true?
can_proto_register takes care of it.
> -		err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> +		err = -EPROTOTYPE;
>  		goto errout;
>  	}
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html