lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:51:14 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>, David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, Mocean Laboratories <info@...ean-labs.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] timberdale: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers Hi Ben, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:16:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > So, adding an MFD cell pointer to the device structure allows us to cleanly > > pass both pieces of information, while keeping all the MFD sub drivers > > independant from the MFD core if they want/can. > > Why isn't an MFD the parent of its component devices? It actually is. How would that help here ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists