| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1302152327.2701.50.camel@edumazet-laptop> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:58:47 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Wei Gu <wei.gu@...csson.com> Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> Subject: RE: Question on "net: allocate skbs on local node" Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 10:16 +0800, Wei Gu a écrit : > Hi Eric, > Testing with ixgbe Linux 2.6.38 driver: > We have a little better thruput figure with this driver, but it looks > not scalling at all, I always stressed one CPU core/24. > And when look the perf report for ksoftirqd/24, the most cost function > is still "_raw_spin_unlock_irqstore" and the IRQ/s is huge, it's > somehow conflicts with desgin of NAPI. On linux 2.6.32 while the CPU > was stressed the IRQ will descreased while the NAPI will running much > on the polling mode. I don't know why on 2.6.38 the IRQ was keep > increasing. CC netdev and Intel guys, since they said it should not happen (TM) IF you dont use DCA (make sure ioatdma module is not loaded), how comes alloc_iova() is called at all ? IF you use DCA, how comes its called, since the same CPU serves a given interrupt ? > > CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y > > PerfTop: 512417 irqs/sec kernel:91.3% exact: 0.0% [1000Hz cpu-clock-msecs], (all, 64 CPUs) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - 0.82% ksoftirqd/24 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > \u2592 - _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > \u2592 - 44.27% alloc_iova > \u2592 intel_alloc_iova > \u2592 __intel_map_single > \u2592 intel_map_page > \u2592 - ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme > \u2592 - 59.97% ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers > \u2592 ixgbe_clean_rx_irq > \u2592 0xffffffffa033a5 > \u2592 net_rx_action > u2592 __do_softirq > \u2592 + call_softirq > \u2592 - 40.03% ixgbe_change_mtu > \u2592 ixgbe_change_mtu > \u2592 dev_hard_start_xmit > \u2592 sch_direct_xmit > \u2592 dev_queue_xmit > \u2592 vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit > \u2592 hook_func > \u2592 nf_iterate > \u2592 nf_hook_slow > \u2592 NF_HOOK.clone.1 > \u2592 ip_rcv > \u2592 __netif_receive_skb > \u2592 __netif_receive_skb > \u2592 netif_receive_skb > \u2592 napi_skb_finish > \u2592 napi_gro_receive > \u2592 ixgbe_clean_rx_irq > \u2592 0xffffffffa033a5 > \u2592 net_rx_action > \u2592 __do_softirq > \u2592 + call_softirq > \u2592 + 35.85% find_iova > \u2592 + 19.44% add_unmap > > > Thanks > WeiGu > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists