[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTiketFqStHcucXPFnuL3awGgpHQMQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:07:34 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit"
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> ...will try the patch from [1]:
>
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130215119417648&w=2
>
The patch from above fixes my network problems.
Thanks.
- Sedat -
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> [ The long CC list I got via ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> with yesterday's linux-next (next-20110406) I discovered first time
>> network problems.
>> Today's next-20110407 shows the same symptoms.
>> In my IRC client the connection via SSL-encryption to freenode and
>> oftc are not established.
>> Also, I saw "stalls" on websites in firefox.
>>
>> Luckily, next-20110405 was OK, so I started to look at the
>> net-next-2.6 merge and its commits.
>> ( Furthermore, I tested a 2.6.39-rc2 vanilla kernel to ensure the
>> problem comes from linux-next patch. )
>>
>> By reverting all 10 commits my system worked as expected, here the list:
>>
>> 0001-Revert-net-Allow-no-cache-copy-from-user-on-transmit.patch
>> 0002-Revert-bridge-range-check-STP-parameters.patch
>> 0003-Revert-bridge-allow-creating-bridge-devices-with-net.patch
>> 0004-Revert-bridge-allow-creating-deleting-fdb-entries-vi.patch
>> 0005-Revert-bridge-add-netlink-notification-on-forward-en.patch
>> 0006-Revert-bridge-split-rcu-and-no-rcu-cases-of-fdb-look.patch
>> 0007-Revert-bridge-track-last-used-time-in-forwarding-tab.patch
>> 0008-Revert-bridge-change-arguments-to-fdb_create.patch
>> 0009-Revert-pkt_sched-QFQ-quick-fair-queue-scheduler.patch
>> 0010-Revert-xen-netfront-assume-all-hw-features-are-avail.patch
>>
>> In a next run, I started with only
>> "0001-Revert-net-Allow-no-cache-copy-from-user-on-transmit.patch".
>> It turned out that this is the culprit commit.
>> ( I have not played with the new ethtool option tx-nocache-copy in
>> "BROKEN" kernel. )
>>
>> My wificard is an Atheros ath5k.
>> I attached my kernel-config and the revert-patch which makes the
>> system stable again.
>>
>> Can you have a look at it?
>>
>> I you want me to help with debugging, please give me precise instructions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists