[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9DFD6A.1060200@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:07:38 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"randy.dunlap@...cle.com" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl" <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-visws-devel@...ts.sf.net" <linux-visws-devel@...ts.sf.net>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"pazke@...pac.ru" <pazke@...pac.ru>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: drop anti-dependency on X86_VISWS
On 04/06/2011 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:45 +0100, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:55:55 +0100
>>
>>> You mean the "!X86_VISWS" I presume? It doesn't make sense to me either.
>> No, I think 32-bit x86 allmodconfig elides XEN because of it's X86_TSC dependency.
> TSC is a real dependency of the Xen interfaces.
Not really. The TSC register is a requirement, but that's going to be
present on any CPU which can boot Xen. We don't need any of the
kernel's TSC machinery though.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists