| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:12:31 +0800
From: Wei Gu <wei.gu@...csson.com>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
Hi Alexander,
The total thruput with 400byte UDP receiving(terminate on prerouting hook) on 2.6.32 is over >1.5Mpps without packet lost.
I even tried forward this receved packets back on same NIC, I get >1.5Mpps Rx with same amount of Tx, no rx_missing_error at all. And even with some 68byte packets I was reach 5Mpps+/NIC on 2.6.32 kernel.
I was expect to gain even higher performance with this new linux kernel with same HW configuration.
Yes, the DMAR is off, I can get +1Mpps,but as I said not stable at all.(high rx_missing_error rate).
I'm sure the slot for eth10 was x8 Gen2:
[ixgbe: eth10: ixgbe_probe: (PCI Express:5.0Gb/s:Width x8) 00:1b:21:6b:45:cc]
For the memory configuration, I was using the same server as I was testing with 2.6.32. I have total 64G * 4 merory which is 100% memory bandwidth with 4 sock CPUs, recommended by HP expert( 8 DIMM's per processor in slot Cartridge).
Does anything from Linux kernel will affact these memory configuration thing?
numactl --hardware
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
node 0 size: 65525 MB
node 0 free: 63226 MB
node 1 cpus: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 1 size: 65536 MB
node 1 free: 63292 MB
node 2 cpus: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
node 2 size: 65536 MB
node 2 free: 63366 MB
node 3 cpus: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
node 3 size: 65535 MB
node 3 free: 63345 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 20 20 20
1: 20 10 20 20
2: 20 20 10 20
3: 20 20 20 10
Lspci -vvv
8d:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Ethernet Server Adapter X520-2
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx+
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 50
Region 0: Memory at f0200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K]
Region 2: I/O ports at 8000 [size=32]
Region 4: Memory at f0284000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at f0600000 [disabled] [size=512K]
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Masking: 00000000 Pending: 00000000
Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=64 Masked-
Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
PBA: BAR=4 offset=00002000
Capabilities: [a0] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 512 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+ FLReset-
MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr+ UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend+
LnkCap: Port #2, Speed 5GT/s, Width x8, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 unlimited, L1 <32us
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x8, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+
DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-
LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB
Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
UESta: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
UEMsk: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
UESvrt: DLP+ SDES- TLP+ FCP+ CmpltTO+ CmpltAbrt+ UnxCmplt+ RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
CESta: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
CEMsk: RxErr+ BadTLP+ BadDLLP+ Rollover+ Timeout+ NonFatalErr+
AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+ ChkEn-
Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number 00-1b-21-ff-ff-6b-45-18
Capabilities: [150] Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation (ARI)
ARICap: MFVC- ACS-, Next Function: 1
ARICtl: MFVC- ACS-, Function Group: 0
Capabilities: [160] Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV)
IOVCap: Migration-, Interrupt Message Number: 000
IOVCtl: Enable- Migration- Interrupt- MSE- ARIHierarchy+
IOVSta: Migration-
Initial VFs: 64, Total VFs: 64, Number of VFs: 64, Function Dependency Link: 00
VF offset: 128, stride: 2, Device ID: 10ed
Supported Page Size: 00000553, System Page Size: 00000001
Region 0: Memory at 0000000000000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
Region 3: Memory at 0000000000000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
VF Migration: offset: 00000000, BIR: 0
Kernel driver in use: ixgbe
Kernel modules: ixgbe
Thanks
WeiGu
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander H Duyck [mailto:alexander.h.duyck@...el.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:41 PM
To: Wei Gu
Cc: Eric Dumazet; netdev; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
Subject: RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 20:36 -0700, Wei Gu wrote:
> Hi Alexander, I do agree with you that if only the rx_missing_error
> (rx_no_buffer_count: 0) indicates the memory bandwidth issue. But the
> strange thing is I using the same test configuration on Linux 2.6.32,
> which looks no this problem at all. SO it not a HW setup problem at
> all, only difference in on the Kernel version, that's why I go back to
> you guys for this new Linux 2.6.38, if it will affact this memory
> bandwidth Or BIOS etc things?
What were the numbers you were getting with 2.6.32? I would be interested in seeing those number just to get an idea of how they compare against the 2.6.38 kernel.
> The follow dump is done, while I was try to receive 290Kpps 400Byte
> pakets from IXIA, and drop them in the prerouting hook. I bind the
> eth10 8 RX queue to CPU sock ID 3 ( core 24-31) on NUMA NODE3
Just to confirm this is with DMAR off? I saw an earlier email that said you were getting a variable amount that was over 1Mpps and just want to confirm this is with the same config.
> ethtool -i eth10
> driver: ixgbe
> version: 3.2.10-NAPI
> firmware-version: 0.9-3
> bus-info: 0000:8d:00.0
>
> ethtool -S eth10
> NIC statistics:
> rx_packets: 14222510
> tx_packets: 109
> rx_bytes: 5575223920
> tx_bytes: 17790
> rx_missed_errors: 15150244
> rx_no_buffer_count: 0
I trimmed down your stats here pretty significantly. This isn't an issue with the driver not keeping up. The problem here is memory and/or bus bandwidth. Based on the info you provided I am assuming you have a quad socket system. I'm curious how the memory is laid out. What is the total memory size, memory per node, and do you have all of the memory channels on each node populated? One common thing I've seen cause these type of issues is an incorrect memory configuration.
Also if you could send me an lspci -vvv for 8d:00.0 specifically I would appreciate it as I would like to look over the PCIe config just to make sure the slot is a x8 PCIe gen 2.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists