[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DA39330.2030102@scotdoyle.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:48:00 -0500
From: Scot Doyle <lkml@...tdoyle.com>
To: Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Nickel <Sebastian.Nickel@...zner.de>,
Pallai Roland <pallair@...ex.hu>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge
On 04/09/2011 02:19 AM, Hiroaki SHIMODA wrote:
>
> It seems that the bug trap is occurred in ip_options_compile() due to
> rt is NULL.
>
> 8b 96 cc 00 00 00 mov 0xcc(%rsi),%edx
> rsi is rt, and 0xcc means rt->rt_spec_dst. So I think below code hit
> the bug trap.
>
> 332 if (skb) {
> 333 memcpy(&optptr[optptr[2]-1],&rt->rt_spec_dst, 4);<- here
> 334 opt->is_changed = 1;
> 335 }
>
> And call trace seems as follows.
> __netif_receive_skb()
> -> br_handle_frame()
> -> NF_HOOK()
> -> br_nf_pre_routing()
> -> br_parse_ip_options()
> -> ip_options_compile()
>
> br_parse_ip_options() was introduced at 462fb2a (bridge : Sanitize
> skb before it enters the IP stack) but ip_options_compile() or
> ip_options_rcv_srr() seems to be called with no rt info.
Thanks to a tip from Sebastian, I can now reproduce this panic by
running "IP Stack Integrity Checker v0.07" from another machine on the
same subnet with command "icmpsic -s x.y.z.a -d x.y.z.b" where "x.y.z.a"
is IP address of the other machine and "x.y.z.b" is the IP address of
the target. When I enable iptables logging on the target machine, no
panic occurs. When I disable iptables logging (but otherwise leave the
same iptables rules) a panic occurs within a few seconds.
Thanks Hiroaki for the analysis of the kernel panic output. I've
confirmed that you are correct by placing a printk just before those two
lines. In every panic, the printk was triggered on line 333 of
net/ipv4/ip_options.c
The kernel panic does not occur after applying the following patch.
# diff net/ipv4/ip_options.c.original net/ipv4/ip_options.c.fix
332c332
< if (skb) {
---
> if (skb && rt) {
374c374
< if (skb) {
---
> if (skb && rt) {
What do you all think? Will it cause other problems?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists