netdev - RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:00:49 +0800
From:	Wei Gu <wei.gu@...csson.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel

I will try the lastest driver 3.3.8 on  e1000.sf.net:)

But I also tested the ixgbe-3.2.10 on the kernel 2.6.35.1 and 2.6.35.2,The problem start happens from 2.6.35.2, no problem at all with 2.6.35.1 kernel.
I don't know if some patch between 2.6.35.1 and 2.35.2 had some impact to this Intel 10GE ixgbe driver.

Thanks
WeiGu

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.h.duyck@...el.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:50 PM
To: Wei Gu
Cc: Eric Dumazet; netdev; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
Subject: Re: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel

On 4/10/2011 12:02 AM, Wei Gu wrote:
> Hi , I haven't enable the packet header spilting, so I think no
> netdev_alloc_page() will be called in my case.
>
> BTW, I also did the same test from 2.6.33 to 2.6.35 kernel, looks the
> problem happens from 2.6.35, cause 2.6.32/33/34 do not see this
> problem at all, they all works pretty good.
>
> I modify the .configs base on the FC13/14, and also manully set the
> DMAR DEFAULT to off, chose the SLAB as the memory allocator (same as
> RHEL6 2.6.32). For more detail about the config, please check the
> attached file
>
> Thanks WeiGu

WeiGu,

In order to try and isolate this issue I was wondering if you could try our out-of-tree ixgbe driver from e1000.sf.net?  The idea would be to test it on 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 in order to determine if the issue is due to a change in the kernel or a change in the driver.  If the performance is the same on these two kernels with our out-of-tree driver then we know the issue is a change somewhere in the ixgbe driver in the kernel.

Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html