[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302614145.3233.47.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:15:45 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jan Lübbe <jluebbe@...ian.org>
Cc: Scot Doyle <lkml@...tdoyle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge
Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 15:02 +0200, Jan Lübbe a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Considering recent changes in ip_options_echo() I would suggest to add
> > following patch and/or revert commit 8628bd8af7c4c14f40
> > (ipv4: Fix IP timestamp option (IPOPT_TS_PRESPEC) handling in
> > ip_options_echo())
>
> I've read this thread, but I'm not sure why my patch is related to these
> kernel panics. The behavior is only changed for packets with the
> timestamp option in prespecified addresses mode. Even then, it shouldn't
> cause ip_options_build to write to unallocated memory later.
>
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_options.c b/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > index 28a736f..35f2bf9 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ int ip_options_echo(struct ip_options * dopt, struct sk_buff * skb)
> > *dptr++ = IPOPT_END;
> > dopt->optlen++;
> > }
> > + if (unlikely(dopt->optlen > 40)) {
> > + pr_err("ip_options_echo() fatal error optlen=%u > 40\n", dopt->optlen);
> > + print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "ip options: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
> > + 16, 1, dopt->__data, dopt->optlen, false);
> > + }
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Here you check dopt->optlen, which certainly should be 40 at most. The
> calculation of dopt->optlen wasn't changed by my patch, though.
Check again the thread Jan.
Scot is using a tool (IP Stack Checker's tcpsic) to forge random tcp
packets.
Maybe your patch is fine but requires a change in a previous function,
to make sure we deny some crazy packet before generating an ip_options
with more than 40 bytes, in an icmp_send() reply.
I took a look at this ip_options stuff and must say its really hard to
even _read_ the code. Understanding it might need several days or a new
brain ?
I cannot Ack or Nack your patch, I must admit it. Isnt it frightening ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists