[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D12839161ADD3A4B8DA63D1A134D084026E49097D0@ESGSCCMS0001.eapac.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:22:59 +0800
From: Wei Gu <wei.gu@...csson.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
I was not stress the NIC/CPU, since I only send 290Kpps 400byte packets towards eth10. the CPU load almost 100%IDEL.
BTW, there are some problem with perf tool on 2.6.35.2, I will try to get you the top offenders if possible.
Thanks
WeiGu
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Wei Gu
Cc: Alexander Duyck; netdev; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
Subject: RE: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
Le lundi 11 avril 2011 à 23:14 +0800, Wei Gu a écrit :
> I tried the ixgbe-3.3.8 (insmod ixgbe.ko RSS=8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8 FdirMode=0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 Node=0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3) from e1000.sf.net both on 2.6.35.1 and 2.6.35.2, same observation as 3.2.10 ixgbe driver, On 2.6.35.2 it have high rx errors:
> Ethtool -S eth10 |grep error
> rx_errors: 0
> tx_errors: 0
> rx_over_errors: 0
> rx_crc_errors: 0
> rx_frame_errors: 0
> rx_fifo_errors: 0
> rx_missed_errors: 2263088
> tx_aborted_errors: 0
> tx_carrier_errors: 0
> tx_fifo_errors: 0
> tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
> rx_long_length_errors: 0
> rx_short_length_errors: 0
> rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
> fcoe_last_errors: 0
>
It would be nice you post perf record / perf report results
During your stress , do
perf record -a -g sleep 10
perf report
And post "top offenders"
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists