lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:14:11 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jan Lübbe <jluebbe@...ian.org>
Cc:	Scot Doyle <lkml@...tdoyle.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Bandan Das <bandan.das@...atus.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge

Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 17:13 +0200, Jan Lübbe a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: 
> > Of course, this might be a complete shot in the dark, but a
> > stackprotector fault in icmp_send() really sounds like a problem in
> > ip_options_echo() [ or bad input data given to this function ]
> 
> It was my understanding that all IP options given to ip_options_echo are
> either from local sources or have gone through ip_options_compile, which
> seems to verify that the sum of the individual option lengths do not
> exceed the ip header. So there wouldn't need to be additional checks in
> ip_options_echo.
> 
> If this is not the case, we need size checks in ip_options_echo before
> copying over each option.
> 
> > Other related changes (but as old as v2.6.22) :
> > 
> > commit 11a03f78fbf15a866ba
> > ([NetLabel]: core network changes)
> 
> When investigating the problem I had with timestamps, i found that most
> of the lines in ip_options_echo and _compile have not been changed since
> before 2.2 (some even before 2.0). The newer changes have all been
> updates for changed API elsewhere in the stack.
> 

commit 462fb2af9788a82 might be the problem.
(bridge : Sanitize skb before it enters the IP stack)

We are supposed to provide a zeroed ip_options to ip_options_compile()

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
index 008ff6c..f3bc322 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -249,11 +249,9 @@ static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		goto drop;
 	}
 
-	/* Zero out the CB buffer if no options present */
-	if (iph->ihl == 5) {
-		memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
+	memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
+	if (iph->ihl == 5)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	opt->optlen = iph->ihl*4 - sizeof(struct iphdr);
 	if (ip_options_compile(dev_net(dev), opt, skb))



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ