netdev - Re: [PATCH NET-2.6 1/1] qlcnic: limit skb frags for non tso packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110412.135522.71113479.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	amit.salecha@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ameen.rahman@...gic.com,
	anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH NET-2.6 1/1] qlcnic: limit skb frags for non tso packet

From: Amit Kumar Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:19:41 -0700

> <<< No Message Collected >>>

Can you PLEASE fix your email.

PLEASE?

Yesterday you spammed us all, and today you've sent three postings
with this subject line.

1) One with the patch, and the proper set of CC:'s (myself, other
   qlogic engineers, netdev, and stable)

2) One with the patch, and a too short CC: list (only netdev and
   stable)

3) And now this email with no actual content and a weird message.

I really can't spend my afternoons sifting through the emails that
spam from qlogic, trying to figure out which ones I should pay
attention to for review, and which ones are spam.

Please resend properly any patches you actually want me to pay
attention to.

If you cannot make sure at this time that the patches will be sent
without incident, sit on them until you can.

Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html