[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302800202.2035.32.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:56:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: Wei Gu <wei.gu@...csson.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:42 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> I'm doing some more digging into this now. One thought that occurred to
> me is that if the patch you mention is having some sort of effect this
> could be a sign of perhaps a kernel timer or scheduling problem.
Right, so the removal of the NO_HZ throttle will allow the CPU to go
into C states more often, this could result in longer wake-up times for
IRQs.
We reverted because:
- it caused significant battery drain due to not going into C states
often enough, and
- its a much better idea to implement these things in the idle
governor since it already has the job of guestimating the idle
duration.
I really can't remember back far enough to even come up with a theory of
why kernels prior to merging the NO_HZ throttle would not exhibit this
problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists