[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302747479.3549.10.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:17:59 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, kees@...flux.net
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut
down socket any more
Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 à 12:09 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:00:08 +0200
>
> > Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 à 04:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> >
> >> Since SO_REUSEPORT is not a 'stable fix', I suggest we revert the patch,
> >> and eventually work on SO_REUSEPORT on net-next-2.6
> >>
> >> What do you think ?
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, I should have mentioned commit id : c191a836a908d1dd6
> > (tcp: disallow bind() to reuse addr/port)
>
> I'm commiting the revert as follows to net-2.6, and will queue
> it up for -stable as well:
>
> --------------------
> Revert "tcp: disallow bind() to reuse addr/port"
>
> This reverts commit c191a836a908d1dd6b40c503741f91b914de3348.
>
> It causes known regressions for programs that expect to be able to use
> SO_REUSEADDR to shutdown a socket, then successfully rebind another
> socket to the same ID.
>
> Programs such as haproxy and amavisd expect this to work.
>
> This should fix kernel bugzilla 32832.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
Thanks David, I was planning to submit this revert this morning, you
beat me ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists