[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110416165651.GA29966@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:56:51 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cxgb4{,vf}: convert to hw_features
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:00:47PM -0700, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
> Michał Mirosław wrote:
[...]
>> + netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | TSO_FLAGS |
>> + NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM |
>> + NETIF_F_RXCSUM | NETIF_F_RXHASH |
>> + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX;
>> + netdev->features |= netdev->hw_features | highdma;
>> netdev->vlan_features = netdev->features & VLAN_FEAT;
> Here vlan_features does not include NETIF_F_RXCSUM but the cxgb4vf bits
> below do include it. I looked at some other drivers and saw again some
> include it and some don't. The core VLAN code handles NETIF_F_RXCSUM on
> its own. Is there some rule for whether drivers should set it in their
> vlan_features or not?
Since NETIF_F_RXCSUM is ignored in vlan_features I'd rather see it not set.
(fixed in v2)
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgb4/sge.c b/drivers/net/cxgb4/sge.c
>> index 311471b..e8f6f8e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/cxgb4/sge.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/cxgb4/sge.c
>> @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ int t4_ethrx_handler(struct sge_rspq *q, const __be64 *rsp,
>> pi = netdev_priv(skb->dev);
>> rxq->stats.pkts++;
>> - if (csum_ok && (pi->rx_offload & RX_CSO) &&
>> + if (csum_ok && (q->netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) &&
>> (pkt->l2info & htonl(RXF_UDP | RXF_TCP))) {
>> if (!pkt->ip_frag) {
>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> With this change variable 'pi' can be removed but I can do this cleanup
> after this patch goes in.
I've included it in v2.
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf_main.c b/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf_main.c
>> index c662679..04a5c2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf_main.c
>> @@ -2638,14 +2597,13 @@ static int __devinit cxgb4vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> * it.
>> */
>> pi->xact_addr_filt = -1;
>> - pi->rx_offload = RX_CSO;
>> netif_carrier_off(netdev);
>> netdev->irq = pdev->irq;
>> - netdev->features = (NETIF_F_SG | TSO_FLAGS |
>> - NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM |
>> - NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX |
>> - NETIF_F_GRO);
>> + netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | TSO_FLAGS | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>> + NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM |
>> + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX;
>> + netdev->features = netdev->hw_features;
>> if (pci_using_dac)
>> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
>> netdev->vlan_features =
> cxgb4vf does not implement toggling of NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX so I think the
> flag should be set in features but not hw_features or maybe the driver
> needs to handle it in fix_features?
Fixed in v2.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists