[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110416021148.GC2200@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:11:48 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
nhorman <nhorman@...el2.think-freely.org>,
Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq: Add registered affinity guidance infrastructure
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:22:58AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> > From: nhorman <nhorman@...el2.think-freely.org>
> >
> > This patch adds the needed data to the irq_desc struct, as well as the needed
> > API calls to allow the requester of an irq to register a handler function to
> > determine the affinity_hint of that irq when queried from user space.
>
> This changelog simply sucks. It does not explain the rationale for
> this churn at all.
>
It seems pretty clear to me. It allows a common function to update the value of
affinity_hint when its queried.
> Which problem is it solving?
> Why are the current interfaces not sufficient?
Did you read the initial post that I sent with it? Apparently not. Apologies,
its seems my git-send-email didn't cc everyone I expected it to:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130291921026187&w=2
I'll skip the rest of your your email, and just try to turn some of your rant
into something more acceptible to you.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists