[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418080606.GA3809@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:06:07 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 3/4] ptp: Added a clock driver for the IXP46x.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:56:03AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 April 2011, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > +
> > + lo = __raw_readl(®s->channel[ch].src_uuid_lo);
> > + hi = __raw_readl(®s->channel[ch].src_uuid_hi);
> > +
>
> I guess you should use readl(), not __raw_readl() here. The __raw_* functions
> are not meant for device drivers.
Krzysztof had a different opinion about this.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/8/67
Anyway, it is his driver, and I just followed what he does elsewhere
in the driver. It make sense to me to keep the driver consistent.
Maybe we should make the change throughout?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists