lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104182115291.14027@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:16:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se>
To:	Joe Buehler <aspam@....net>
cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DSCP values in TCP handshake

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Joe Buehler wrote:

> The argument I have seen for not making reflection standard behavior is 
> that it is not always appropriate for the application.  For example, web 
> servers have short requests but large responses so non-identical DSCP 
> values might make more sense.

I'm a router guy. I don't understand this reasoning at all.

Anyone care to elaborate?

I'd like reflection be standard and have the application set DSCP if it 
needs to.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@....pp.se
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ