[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAD1A47.5080007@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:14:47 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lksctp <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6 7/8] sctp: Allow bindx_del to accept 0 port
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
We allow 0 port when adding new addresses. It only
makes sence to allow 0 port when removing addresses.
When removing the currently bound port will be used
when the port in the address is set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 5c9980a..431b890 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -658,11 +658,15 @@ static int sctp_bindx_rem(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *addrs, int addrcnt)
goto err_bindx_rem;
}
- if (sa_addr->v4.sin_port != htons(bp->port)) {
+ if (sa_addr->v4.sin_port &&
+ sa_addr->v4.sin_port != htons(bp->port)) {
retval = -EINVAL;
goto err_bindx_rem;
}
+ if (!sa_addr->v4.sin_port)
+ sa_addr->v4.sin_port = htons(bp->port);
+
/* FIXME - There is probably a need to check if sk->sk_saddr and
* sk->sk_rcv_addr are currently set to one of the addresses to
* be removed. This is something which needs to be looked into
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists