lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAD84B1.9020405@monstr.eu>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:48:49 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add NAPI support to ll_temac driver

Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:43 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> [...]
>> One possible way to get better performance is to change driver to
>> allocate skbs only right before calling netif_rx(), so that you dont
>> have to access cold sk_buff data twice (once when allocating skb and put
>> it in ring buffer, a second time when receiving frame)
>>
>> drivers/net/niu.c is a good example for this (NAPI + netdev_alloc_skb()
>> just in time + pull in skbhead only first cache line of packet)
> [...]
> 
> If the hardware can do RX checksumming (it's not clear) then the driver
> should pass the paged buffers into GRO and that will take care of skb
> allocation as necessary.

Hardware supports RX and TX partial checksumming. I can enable it. The driver 
has also this option and from my tests there is of course some performance 
improvemetn.

Just for sure - here are links on documentation.
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/xps_ll_temac.pdf
or
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/axi_ethernet/v2_01_a/ds759_axi_ethernet.pdf

About SKB allocation. I fixed our non mainline driver to allocate skb based on 
current mtu size. Mainline driver allocate max mtu (9k). This has also impact on 
performance because Microblaze works with smaller SKBs.

Can you please be more specific about passing the paged buffers into GRO?
Or point me to any documentation or code which can help me to understand what 
that means.

Thanks,
Michal


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ