[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1104201658280.1686-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:08:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Paul Stewart <pstew@...omium.org>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] usbnet: Resubmit interrupt URB once if halted
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Set a flag if the interrupt URB completes with ENOENT as this
> occurs legitimately during system suspend. When the usbnet_bh
> is called after resume, test this flag and try once to resubmit
> the interrupt URB.
No doubt there's a good reason for doing things this way, but it isn't
clear. Why wait until usbnet_bh() is called after resume? Why not
resubmit the interrupt URB _during_ usbnet_resume()? This would seem
to be the logical approach, seeing as how usbnet_suspend() kills the
interrupt URB.
For that matter, where does the interrupt URB get deallocated? It
obviously gets allocated in init_status(), but it doesn't seem to be
freed anywhere.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists