[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110420.014536.70181162.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fubar@...ibm.com
Cc: jbohac@...e.cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andy@...yhouse.net,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: 802.3ad - fix agg_device_up
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:55:03 -0700
> Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz> wrote:
>
>>The slave member of struct aggregator does not necessarily point
>>to a slave which is part of the aggregator. It points to the
>>slave structure containing the aggregator structure, while
>>completely different slaves (or no slaves at all) may be part of
>>the aggregator.
>>
>>The agg_device_up() function wrongly uses agg->slave to find the state of the
>>aggregator. Use agg->lag_ports->slave instead. The bug has been
>>introduced by commit 4cd6fe1c6483cde93e2ec91f58b7af9c9eea51ad.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
>
> One additional note: port->slave can be NULL when the slave is
> transitioning in or out of the bond, but not when the port is part of an
> aggregator, so this usage should be safe.
>
> -J
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists