[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110421140817.1782b2a9@nehalam>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:08:17 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix bridged bonds in 802.3ad mode
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:43:12 -0400
Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> On 21/04/11 03:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 20:47 +0200, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> >> 802.3ad bonding inside a bridge is broken again. Originally fixed by
> >> 43aa1920117801fe9ae3d1fad886b62511e09bee, the bug was re-introduced by
> >> 1e253c3b8a1aeed51eef6fc366812f219b97de65.
> >>
> >> LACP frames must not have their skb->dev changed by the bridging hook.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> >>
> >> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >> @@ -1514,6 +1514,11 @@ static rx_handler_result_t bond_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> >> memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, bond->dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /* prevent bridging code from mangling and forwarding LACP frames */
> >> + if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD &&
> >> + skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_SLOW))
> >> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> >> +
> >> return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > It seems to me that 1e253c3b8a1aeed51eef6fc366812f219b97de65 is bogus
>
> You bet, it's rubbish ;)
>
> Any thoughts on how we could support a transparent bridging
> configuration without repurposing br->stp_enabled or adding another
> option to bridge-utils?
>
> btw, the particular scenario I was trying to address is a virtual
> machine bridged to an ethernet interface connected to a switch port with
> 802.1x enabled.
>
> -Benjamin
>
> > and should be reverted, rather than worked around by other drivers. We
> > shouldn't enable non-conformant forwarding behaviour by default just
> > because some people find it useful. The administrator should have to
> > explicitly enable it.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
>
The IEEE standard says bridge's shouldn't forward link-local addresses.
The problem is that people expect it to.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists