[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DB0FFB1.3010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:10:25 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Michio Honda <micchie@....wide.ad.jp>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4 4/5] sctp: Add ASCONF operation on the
single-homed host
>
> Since the sender MUST NOT use the new IP address as a source for ANY SCTP
> packet except on carrying an ASCONF Chunk. And ASCONF chunk can be bundled.
> How about this change. If so, you do not need change to sctp_outq_tail();
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> index 1c88c89..bd6cc9c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> @@ -754,6 +754,13 @@ static int sctp_outq_flush(struct sctp_outq *q, int rtx_timeout)
> */
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp, &q->control_chunk_list, list) {
> + /* RFC 5061, 5.3
> + * F1) This ...
> + */
> + if (q->asoc->src_out_of_asoc_ok &&
> + chunk->chunk_hdr->type != SCTP_CID_ASCONF)
SCTP_CID_ASCONF_ACK should be also allowed, the peer may
send ASCONF to do the same thing at the same time.
> + continue;
> +
> list_del_init(&chunk->list);
>
> /* Pick the right transport to use. */
> @@ -881,6 +888,9 @@ static int sctp_outq_flush(struct sctp_outq *q, int rtx_timeout)
> }
> }
>
> + if (q->asoc->src_out_of_asoc_ok)
> + goto sctp_flush_out;
> +
> /* Is it OK to send data chunks? */
> switch (asoc->state) {
> case SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED:
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists