[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikUAGWhNnCrebQpVttorqVxfD6KWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:49:40 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] veth: remove unneeded ifname code from veth_newlink()
W dniu 22 kwietnia 2011 11:43 użytkownik Michał Mirosław
<mirqus@...il.com> napisał:
> 2011/1/24 Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>:
>> The code is not needed because tb[IFLA_IFNAME] is already
>> processed in rtnl_newlink(). Remove this redundancy.
> Hi. This patch broke creation of veth devices. Reverting it fixes the issue.
>
> Symptoms:
>
> icybox:~# ip link add type veth
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> icybox:~# ip link add type veth peer veth1
> icybox:~# ip addr
> [...]
> 56: D: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
> link/ether e6:57:58:52:03:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 57: veth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
> link/ether c2:c2:a2:d5:d5:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Hmm. I was too quick. Reverting it fixes only first problem - "ip link
add type veth" adds new veth pair now, but "ip link add type veth peer
veth1" gives the same result as above.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists