[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikav_NimAoFj_2Wo-BMD-3uVjU--w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:39:18 +0800
From: zhou rui <zhourui.cn@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:19 +0800, zhou rui wrote:
>> hi
>> here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel
>> 82599? for example
>> I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue
>> 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work
>>
>> don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated?
>>
>> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on
>>
>> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0
>> dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0
>> dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0
>> user-def-mask 0x0 action 0
> [...]
>
> This specifies a filter for UDP/IPv4 packets, and the masks are wrong.
> If you actually wanted to filter only UDP/IPv4 packets for VID 0-31 then
> the correct syntax would be:
>
> ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 0 vlan-mask 0xf01f
>
> If you don't care about the layer 3/4 protocols then you would need to
> use 'flow-type ether', but no driver implements that yet. (Well, sfc
> implements the *type*, but not filtering by VID only.)
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>
hi ben,thanks for your help,would you mind tell me "32~63" VID filter?
still can not understand the vlan-mask
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists