netdev - Re: [PATCH rfc 2/5] r8169: rtl8169_set_speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1303938817.2875.148.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:13:37 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 2/5] r8169: rtl8169_set_speed_xmii cleanup.

On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 22:37 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> - use ADVERTISE_ALL
> - shorten chipset version test
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Careful readers will notice that the 'supports_gmii' flag is deduced
> from the device PCI id. Though less specific than the chipset related
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_XY, it is currently good enough to detect a GMII
> deprieved 810x.
> Some features may push for a device specific configuration (improved
> jumbo frame support for instance). 'supports_gmii' will follow this
> path if / when the device PCI id stops working.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
> Cc: Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/r8169.c |   14 ++------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> index 0bb0c0d..006f0df 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> @@ -1242,8 +1242,7 @@ static int rtl8169_set_speed_xmii(struct net_device *dev,
>  		int auto_nego;
>  
>  		auto_nego = rtl_readphy(tp, MII_ADVERTISE);
> -		auto_nego &= ~(ADVERTISE_10HALF | ADVERTISE_10FULL |
> -				ADVERTISE_100HALF | ADVERTISE_100FULL);
> +		auto_nego &= ADVERTISE_ALL;
[...]

You mean ~ADVERTISE_ALL.  Though ADVERTISE_ALL is really not a good name
and I think this is clearer with the individual advertising flags
spelled out.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html