netdev - Re: [PATCH] Applying inappropriate ioctl operation on socket should return ENOTTY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:57:37 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Lifeng Sun <lifongsun@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Applying inappropriate ioctl operation on socket
 should return ENOTTY

Le mercredi 27 avril 2011 à 14:37 +0800, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
> On 07:58 Wed 04/27/11 Apr, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Really ?
> > 
> > EINVAL is ok too : Request or argp is not valid.
> 
> I'm afraid not. SUSv4 specifies, say,
> 
>   int tcsetattr(int fildes, int optional_actions,
>          const struct termios *termios_p);
> 
>  ERROR:
>   [EINVAL]
>       The optional_actions argument is not a supported value, or an
>       attempt was made to change an attribute represented in the
>       termios structure to an unsupported value.
> 
>   [ENOTTY]
>       The file associated with fildes is not a terminal.
> 
> which means when we apply tcsetattr (implemented by ioctl) to _any_
> non-terminal file descriptor, it should set errno to ENOTTY rather
> than EINVAL.
> 

You quote manpage for a library call, not a system call.

If you feel your glibc doesnt implement well this, please complain to
glibc maintainer.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html