[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304097558.2686.6.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:19:18 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 à 09:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20110428:
>
>
> when CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled:
>
> bpf_jit_comp.c:(.text+0x43cc2): undefined reference to `module_free'
> (.text+0x4521a): undefined reference to `module_alloc'
> (.text+0x453af): undefined reference to `module_free'
>
>
Oh well, I guess we can add one 'depends on MODULES' like we do for
KPROBES (it also uses module_alloc())
Not sure many people build a !CONFIG_MODULES kernel these days...
Thanks Randy !
[PATCH net-next-2.6] bpf: depends on MODULES
module_alloc() and module_free() are available only if CONFIG_MODULES=y
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/Kconfig | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 745fb02..878151c 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ config HAVE_BPF_JIT
config BPF_JIT
bool "enable BPF Just In Time compiler"
depends on HAVE_BPF_JIT
+ depends on MODULES
---help---
Berkeley Packet Filter filtering capabilities are normally handled
by an interpreter. This option allows kernel to generate a native
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists