netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv4,ipv6,bonding: Restore control over number of peer notifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110429.124429.15250719.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net, kaber@...sh.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, brian.haley@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv4,ipv6,bonding: Restore control over
 number of peer notifications

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:25:52 +0100

> For backward compatibility, we should retain the module parameters and
> sysfs attributes to control the number of peer notifications
> (gratuitous ARPs and unsolicited NAs) sent after bonding failover.
> Also, it is possible for failover to take place even though the new
> active slave does not have link up, and in that case the peer
> notification should be deferred until it does.
> 
> Change ipv4 and ipv6 so they do not automatically send peer
> notifications on bonding failover.
> 
> Change the bonding driver to send separate NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS
> notifications when the link is up, as many times as requested.  Since
> it does not directly control which protocols send notifications, make
> num_grat_arp and num_unsol_na aliases for a single parameter.  Bump
> the bonding version number and update its documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html