[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110430205752.GE2658@psychotron.orion>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:57:52 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, mirqus@...il.com, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6] net: call dev_alloc_name from
register_netdevice
Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 07:34:44PM CEST, shemminger@...tta.com wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:21:32 +0200
>Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Force dev_alloc_name() to be called from register_netdevice() by
>> dev_get_valid_name(). That allows to remove multiple explicit
>> dev_alloc_name() calls.
>>
>> The possibility to call dev_alloc_name in advance remains.
>>
>> This also fixes veth creation regresion caused by
>> 84c49d8c3e4abefb0a41a77b25aa37ebe8d6b743
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>
>The problem with this then you have to audit all the calls
>to register_netdevice to make sure that user can't provide a bad
>value which then is passed a format string. Why not just fix
>just veth which would be safer.
Well it looks convenient to do name allocations inside
register_netdevice generically. For special cases dev_get_valid_name()
can be still used as before (this I think should be also prohibited in
future).
Also I think that drivers should be responsible for what they are
passing from user to core. Btw could you please give me an example of
"a bad value" causing any harm in particular situation?
Thanks
Jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists