[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110502.152733.48516094.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: dont hold rtnl mutex during netlink
dump callbacks
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:43:37 -0700
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:56:07 +0200
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Four years ago, Patrick made a change to hold rtnl mutex during netlink
>> dump callbacks.
>>
>> I believe it was a wrong move. This slows down concurrent dumps, making
>> good old /proc/net/ files faster than rtnetlink in some situations.
>>
>> This occurred to me because one "ip link show dev ..." was _very_ slow
>> on a workload adding/removing network devices in background.
>>
>> All dump callbacks are able to use RCU locking now, so this patch does
>> roughly a revert of commits :
>>
>> 1c2d670f366 : [RTNETLINK]: Hold rtnl_mutex during netlink dump callbacks
>> 6313c1e0992 : [RTNETLINK]: Remove unnecessary locking in dump callbacks
>>
>> This let writers fight for rtnl mutex and readers going full speed.
>>
>> It also takes care of phonet : phonet_route_get() is now called from rcu
>> read section. I renamed it to phonet_route_get_rcu()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> Cc: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Applied, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists