lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304466797.2873.38.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 04 May 2011 00:53:17 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, --no-chain-reply-to@...qlogic.com,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ethtool: Support to take FW dump

On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 16:29 -0700, anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com wrote:
> From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
> 
> Added code to take FW dump via ethtool. A pair of set and get functions are
> added to configure dump level and fetch it from the driver respectively. A
> third function is added to retrieve the dumped FW data from the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/ethtool.h |   20 ++++++++++++
>  net/core/ethtool.c      |   76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index 9de3127..3dd91a5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,19 @@ struct ethtool_flash {
>  	char	data[ETHTOOL_FLASH_MAX_FILENAME];
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct ethtool_dump - used for retrieving, setting device dump
> + * @flag: flag for dump setting
> + * @len: length of dump data
> + * @data: data collected for this command
> + */
> +struct ethtool_dump {
> +	__u32	cmd;
> +	__u32	flag;
> +	__u32	len;
> +	u8	data[0];
> +};
> +

What are the legal values of flags?  Are they expected to be entirely
driver-dependent?

Shouldn't there be a version field, as for register dumps?

>  /* for returning and changing feature sets */
>  
>  /**
> @@ -926,6 +939,10 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
>  				  const struct ethtool_rxfh_indir *);
>  	void	(*get_channels)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_channels *);
>  	int	(*set_channels)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_channels *);
> +	int	(*set_dump)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_dump *);
> +	int	(*get_dump)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_dump *);
> +	int	(*get_dump_data)(struct net_device *,
> +				struct ethtool_dump *, void *);

These need to be properly documented in the header comment.

>  };
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> @@ -997,6 +1014,9 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
>  #define ETHTOOL_SFEATURES	0x0000003b /* Change device offload settings */
>  #define ETHTOOL_GCHANNELS	0x0000003c /* Get no of channels */
>  #define ETHTOOL_SCHANNELS	0x0000003d /* Set no of channels */
> +#define ETHTOOL_SET_DUMP	0x0000003e /* Set dump settings */
> +#define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP	0x0000003f /* Get dump settings */
> +#define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA	0x00000040 /* Get dump data */
>  
>  /* compatibility with older code */
>  #define SPARC_ETH_GSET		ETHTOOL_GSET
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index d8b1a8d..dce547c 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -1827,6 +1827,73 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_flash_device(struct net_device *dev,
>  	return dev->ethtool_ops->flash_device(dev, &efl);
>  }
>  
> +static int ethtool_set_dump(struct net_device *dev,
> +			void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> +	struct ethtool_dump dump;
> +
> +	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_dump)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&dump, useraddr, sizeof(dump)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	return dev->ethtool_ops->set_dump(dev, &dump);
> +}
> +
> +static int ethtool_get_dump(struct net_device *dev,
> +			void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> +	struct ethtool_dump dump;
> +	const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +
> +	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_dump)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&dump, useraddr, sizeof(dump)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (ops->get_dump(dev, &dump))
> +		return -EFAULT;

Why does this change the error code?

> +	if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &dump, sizeof(dump)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ethtool_get_dump_data(struct net_device *dev,
> +				void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	void *data;
> +	struct ethtool_dump dump;
> +	const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +
> +	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_dump_data)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&dump, useraddr, sizeof(dump)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	data = vzalloc(dump.len);

I think we ought to query the driver to find out the maximum dump
length, rather than using the length passed by the user (up to 4GB).  We
already check that the user has the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability but that
should not mean the ability to evade memory limits.

> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	ret = ops->get_dump_data(dev, &dump, data);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ret = -EFAULT;

Why does this change the error code?

> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &dump, sizeof(dump))) {
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	useraddr += offsetof(struct ethtool_dump, data);
> +	if (copy_to_user(useraddr, data, dump.len))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +out:
> +	vfree(data);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /* The main entry point in this file.  Called from net/core/dev.c */
>  
>  int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
> @@ -2043,6 +2110,15 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
>  	case ETHTOOL_SCHANNELS:
>  		rc = ethtool_set_channels(dev, useraddr);
>  		break;
> +	case ETHTOOL_SET_DUMP:
> +		rc = ethtool_set_dump(dev, useraddr);
> +		break;
> +	case ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP:
> +		rc = ethtool_get_dump(dev, useraddr);
> +		break;
> +	case ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA:
> +		rc = ethtool_get_dump_data(dev, useraddr);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ