netdev - Re: 2.6.38.2, kernel panic, probably related to framentation handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304539346.32152.81.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 04 May 2011 22:02:26 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.38.2, kernel panic, probably related to framentation
 handling

Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 20:11 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 19:03 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> 
> > Hi Denys
> > 
> > Is it reproductible, and possibly on latest kernel ?
> > 
> > We fixed some bugs lately (assuming you also use a bridge ?)
> > 
> > Could you send the disassembled code on your kernel of icmp_send() ?
> 
> Oh well, I think I found the problem, I am working on a patch and send
> it shortly.
> 
> Thanks
> 

I believe bug is one year old (2.6.35), please try following patch.

Thanks !

[PATCH] net: ip_expire() must revalidate route

Commit 4a94445c9a5c (net: Use ip_route_input_noref() in input path)
added a bug in IP defragmentation handling, in case timeout is fired.

When a frame is defragmented, we use last skb dst field when building
final skb. Its dst is valid, since we are in rcu read section.

But if a timeout occurs, we take first queued fragment to build one ICMP
TIME EXCEEDED message. Problem is all queued skb have weak dst pointers,
since we escaped RCU critical section after their queueing. icmp_send()
might dereference a now freed (and possibly reused) part of memory.

Calling skb_dst_drop() and ip_route_input_noref() to revalidate route is
the only possible choice.

Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index a1151b8..b1d282f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -223,31 +223,30 @@ static void ip_expire(unsigned long arg)
 
 	if ((qp->q.last_in & INET_FRAG_FIRST_IN) && qp->q.fragments != NULL) {
 		struct sk_buff *head = qp->q.fragments;
+		const struct iphdr *iph;
+		int err;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		head->dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, qp->iif);
 		if (!head->dev)
 			goto out_rcu_unlock;
 
+		/* skb dst is stale, drop it, and perform route lookup again */
+		skb_dst_drop(head);
+		iph = ip_hdr(head);
+		err = ip_route_input_noref(head, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
+					   iph->tos, head->dev);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_rcu_unlock;
+
 		/*
-		 * Only search router table for the head fragment,
-		 * when defraging timeout at PRE_ROUTING HOOK.
+		 * Only an end host needs to send an ICMP
+		 * "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message, per RFC792.
 		 */
-		if (qp->user == IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN && !skb_dst(head)) {
-			const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(head);
-			int err = ip_route_input(head, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
-						 iph->tos, head->dev);
-			if (unlikely(err))
-				goto out_rcu_unlock;
-
-			/*
-			 * Only an end host needs to send an ICMP
-			 * "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message, per RFC792.
-			 */
-			if (skb_rtable(head)->rt_type != RTN_LOCAL)
-				goto out_rcu_unlock;
+		if (qp->user == IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN &&
+		    skb_rtable(head)->rt_type != RTN_LOCAL)
+			goto out_rcu_unlock;
 
-		}
 
 		/* Send an ICMP "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message. */
 		icmp_send(head, ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED, ICMP_EXC_FRAGTIME, 0);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html