[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m14o56pppd.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 07:09:34 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Renato Westphal <renatowestphal@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ns: Wire up the setns system call
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 04:25, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> arch/m68k/include/asm/unistd.h | 3 ++-
>> arch/m68k/kernel/syscalltable.S | 1 +
>
> As the unified syscalltable for m68k/m68knommu is not yet in mainline
> (planned for
> 2.6.40), you should also add it to arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Like so?
>From c06a03281d944ed36e2da02f5374ec6c650e4988 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 07:00:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] m68knommu: Wire up the setns system call
It seems I overlooked m68knommu where I wired up this syscall.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S b/arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S
index 1359ee6..e048015 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/entry_mm.S
@@ -754,4 +754,5 @@ sys_call_table:
.long sys_open_by_handle_at
.long sys_clock_adjtime
.long sys_syncfs
+ .long sys_setns
--
1.7.5.1.217.g4e3aa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists