netdev - Re: Fwd: PROBLEM: IPv6 Duplicate Address Detection with non RFC-conform ICMPv6 packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fc82268416d8f6cfd40ea8b1bc4ebdf@mail.insa-lyon.fr>
Date:	Sat, 07 May 2011 16:35:56 +0200
From:	Gervais Arthur <arthur.gervais@...a-lyon.fr>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: PROBLEM: IPv6 Duplicate Address Detection with non RFC-conform
 ICMPv6 packets

On 05/07/2011 04:06 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
 > Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 15:54 +0200, Gervais Arthur a écrit :
 >
 >> Why would the victim itself claim already having the IPv6 address?
 >>
 >
 > Why should it care ? Please point me the RFC saying its illegal to send
 > or receive a frame with SRC_MAC == DST_MAC
 >

There is no RFC statement saying that this is illegal. But we are not 
only talking about the Ethernet layer. There is also the ICMPv6 Layer.

But neither in the IPv6 RFC's I can find something about this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html