[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52426C6458B2FEE35EF69E4A@Ximines.local>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 19:50:52 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Scalability of interface creation and deletion
--On 7 May 2011 20:42:29 +0200 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Here is my trace here for one device deletion on one 8 core machine
>
> [ 800.447012] synchronize_rcu() in 15787 us
> [ 800.455013] synchronize_rcu() in 7682 us
> [ 800.464019] rcu_barrier() in 8487 us
Would you mind trying it with my script to do veth devices? kill udev and do
unshare -n first.
I've done this on 2 different lots of hardware now, with 3 kernels 18
months apart.
$ grep RCU .config
# RCU Subsystem
CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is not set
# CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64
# CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT is not set
CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y
# CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE is not set
# CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER is not set
# CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set
--
Alex Bligh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists