[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06627C760FB049F1A9321BC6@Ximines.local>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 19:56:22 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Alex Bligh <alex@...x.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Testing interface removal speedup patches from Eric Dumazet.
--On 9 May 2011 11:37:37 -0700 Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
With:
> Created 500 veth in 17.874695 seconds (0.03574939 per interface).
> Deleted 500 veth in 17.023607 seconds. (0.034047214 per interface)
Without:
> Created 500 veth in 22.507598 seconds (0.045015196 per interface).
> Deleted 500 veth in 34.998733 seconds. (0.069997466 per interface)
Interesting. On my tests (albeit with CONFIG_HZ=100) I got:
100 pairs 500 pairs
Interface creation 14ms 110ms
Interface deletion 160ms 148ms
So Eric's patches help in the interface create case, even though
there is no synchronize_net, sychronize_sched() or rcu_barrier() there.
I had assumed the slow create (which varies by number of pairs) was
down to sysfs scalability only (see difference between 14ms and 110ms
there).
Out of interest, if you still happen to have the scripts around, how
fast is veth creation if you just do 100 pairs?
--
Alex Bligh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists