[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110509190516.GE20687@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:05:16 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
Ciprian Docan <docan@...n.rutgers.edu>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/8] r8169: remove non-NAPI context invocation of rtl8169_rx_interrupt.
Invocation of rtl8169_rx_interrupt from rtl8169_reset_task was originally
intended to retrieve as much packets as possible from the rx ring when a
reset was needed. Nowadays rtl8169_reset_task is only scheduled, with
some delay
a. from the tx timeout watchdog
b. when resuming
c. from rtl8169_rx_interrupt itself
It's dubious that the loss of outdated packets will matter much for a)
and b). c) does not need to call itself again.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
---
drivers/net/r8169.c | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index b3cf1d2..81906bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
@@ -4564,6 +4564,7 @@ static void rtl8169_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
struct rtl8169_private *tp =
container_of(work, struct rtl8169_private, task.work);
struct net_device *dev = tp->dev;
+ int i;
rtnl_lock();
@@ -4572,19 +4573,15 @@ static void rtl8169_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
rtl8169_wait_for_quiescence(dev);
- rtl8169_rx_interrupt(dev, tp, tp->mmio_addr, ~(u32)0);
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_RX_DESC; i++)
+ rtl8169_mark_to_asic(tp->RxDescArray + i, rx_buf_sz);
+
rtl8169_tx_clear(tp);
- if (tp->dirty_rx == tp->cur_rx) {
- rtl8169_init_ring_indexes(tp);
- rtl_hw_start(dev);
- netif_wake_queue(dev);
- rtl8169_check_link_status(dev, tp, tp->mmio_addr);
- } else {
- if (net_ratelimit())
- netif_emerg(tp, intr, dev, "Rx buffers shortage\n");
- rtl8169_schedule_work(dev, rtl8169_reset_task);
- }
+ rtl8169_init_ring_indexes(tp);
+ rtl_hw_start(dev);
+ netif_wake_queue(dev);
+ rtl8169_check_link_status(dev, tp, tp->mmio_addr);
out_unlock:
rtnl_unlock();
@@ -4889,20 +4886,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *rtl8169_try_rx_copy(void *data,
return skb;
}
-/*
- * Warning : rtl8169_rx_interrupt() might be called :
- * 1) from NAPI (softirq) context
- * (polling = 1 : we should call netif_receive_skb())
- * 2) from process context (rtl8169_reset_task())
- * (polling = 0 : we must call netif_rx() instead)
- */
static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
struct rtl8169_private *tp,
void __iomem *ioaddr, u32 budget)
{
unsigned int cur_rx, rx_left;
unsigned int count;
- int polling = (budget != ~(u32)0) ? 1 : 0;
cur_rx = tp->cur_rx;
rx_left = NUM_RX_DESC + tp->dirty_rx - cur_rx;
@@ -4962,10 +4951,7 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
rtl8169_rx_vlan_tag(desc, skb);
- if (likely(polling))
- napi_gro_receive(&tp->napi, skb);
- else
- netif_rx(skb);
+ napi_gro_receive(&tp->napi, skb);
dev->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_size;
dev->stats.rx_packets++;
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists