netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] net: fold dev_disable_lro() into netdev_fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 17:29:07 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] net: fold dev_disable_lro() into
 netdev_fix_features()

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:06 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> This implements checks for forwarding mode in netdev_fix_features() using
> dev->priv_flags bits. As a side effect, after device is no longer
> forwarding it gets LRO back. This also means that user is not allowed to
> enable LRO after device is put to forwarding mode.
> 
> This patch depends on removal of discrete offload setting ethtool ops.

This is nice, but:

[...]
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	br_netpoll_disable(p);
>  
>  	call_rcu(&p->rcu, destroy_nbp_rcu);
> +
> +	netdev_update_features(dev);
>  }
>  
>  /* called with RTNL */
> @@ -368,11 +370,9 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  	dev->priv_flags |= IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
>  
> -	dev_disable_lro(dev);
> -
>  	list_add_rcu(&p->list, &br->port_list);
>  
> -	netdev_update_features(br->dev);
> +	netdev_change_features(dev);
>  
>  	spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
>  	changed_addr = br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);

Why netdev_change_features() here?  I thought that was primarily for use
when vlan_features may have been changed.

[...]
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
[...]
> @@ -5241,6 +5221,11 @@ u32 netdev_fix_features(struct net_device *dev, u32 features)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (features & NETIF_F_LRO && dev->priv_flags & IFF_LRO_FORBIDDEN) {
> +		netdev_info(dev, "Disabling LRO for forwarding interface.\n");
> +		features &= NETIF_F_LRO;
[...]

Mising '~'.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html